Prabhupada 0443 - There is no Question of Impersonalism: Difference between revisions

(Created page with "<!-- BEGIN CATEGORY LIST --> Category:1080 English Pages with Videos Category:Prabhupada 0443 - in all Languages Category:EN-Quotes - 1968 Category:EN-Quotes - L...")
 
m (Text replacement - "(<!-- (BEGIN|END) NAVIGATION (.*?) -->\s*){2,}" to "<!-- $2 NAVIGATION $3 -->")
 
Line 7: Line 7:
[[Category:EN-Quotes - in USA, Los Angeles]]
[[Category:EN-Quotes - in USA, Los Angeles]]
<!-- END CATEGORY LIST -->
<!-- END CATEGORY LIST -->
<!-- BEGIN NAVIGATION BAR -- TO CHANGE TO YOUR OWN LANGUAGE BELOW SEE THE PARAMETERS OR VIDEO -->
<!-- BEGIN NAVIGATION BAR -- DO NOT EDIT OR REMOVE -->
{{1080 videos navigation - All Languages|French|FR/Prabhupada 0442 - Dans la théologie Chrétienne, l'individu va à l'église et prie Dieu, "Donnez-nous notre pain quotidien"|0442|FR/Prabhupada 0444 - Les gopis ne sont pas des âmes conditionnées; elles sont des âmes libérées|0444}}
{{1080 videos navigation - All Languages|English|Prabhupada 0442 - In Christian Theology, one Prays to God, 'Give us our Daily Bread'|0442|Prabhupada 0444 - Gopis Are Not Conditioned Souls. They Are Liberated Spirits|0444}}
<!-- END NAVIGATION BAR -->
<!-- END NAVIGATION BAR -->
<!-- BEGIN ORIGINAL VANIQUOTES PAGE LINK-->
<!-- BEGIN ORIGINAL VANIQUOTES PAGE LINK-->
Line 18: Line 18:


<!-- BEGIN VIDEO LINK -->
<!-- BEGIN VIDEO LINK -->
{{youtube_right|MlHFEMpisvU|There is no Question of Impersonalism<br/>- Prabhupāda 0443}}
{{youtube_right|MZWNTSwjbX8|There is no Question of Impersonalism<br/>- Prabhupāda 0443}}
<!-- END VIDEO LINK -->
<!-- END VIDEO LINK -->



Latest revision as of 22:57, 1 October 2020



Lecture on BG 2.8-12 -- Los Angeles, November 27, 1968

Prabhupāda: Go on.

Devotee: "If individuality is not a fact, then Kṛṣṇa would not have stressed it so much even for the future."

Prabhupāda: Yes. He says that there was no such time when we are not individual, and there will be no such time in the future when we shall not remain individual. And so far present is concerned, we are all individual. You know. So where is the possibility of losing individuality? Become imperson? No. There is no possibility. This voidism, impersonalism, they are artificial ways of negating the perplexing variegatedness of this material existence. That is the negative side only. That is not a positive side. A positive side is that, as Kṛṣṇa says, tyaktvā dehaṁ punar janma naiti mām eti kaunteya (BG 4.9). "After giving up this material tabernacle, one comes to Me." Just like after leaving this room, you have to enter another room. You cannot say that "After leaving this room, I shall live in the sky." Similarly, after leaving this body, if you go to Kṛṣṇa in the spiritual kingdom, your individuality will be there, but you'll have that spiritual body. When there is spiritual body there is no perplexities. Just like your body is different from the body of the aquatics. The aquatics, they have no disturbance in the water because their body is made like that. They can live there peacefully. You cannot live. Similarly, the fishes, if you take them out of the water, they cannot live. Similarly, because you are spirit soul, you cannot live peacefully in this material world. This is foreign. But as soon as you enter into the spiritual world, your life is eternal, blissful and full of knowledge, real peace. Tyaktvā dehaṁ punar janma naiti (BG 4.9). Kṛṣṇa says, "After leaving this body, he does not come to this perplexities of material world." Mām eti, "He comes to Me." "Me" means His kingdom, His paraphernalia, His associates, everything. If some rich man or some king says, "All right, you come to me," that does not mean that he's impersonal. If a king says, "Come to..." means that he has got his palace, he has got his secretary, he has got his nice apartment, everything is there. How he can be imperson? But he says only, "Come to me." This "me" means everything. This "me" does not mean impersonal. And we get information from Brahma-saṁhitā, lakṣmī-sahasra-śata-sambhrama-sevyamānaṁ surabhīr abhipālayantam (Bs. 5.29). So He's not impersonal. He's raising cows, He's with hundreds and thousands of goddesses of fortune, His friends, His paraphernalia, His kingdom, His house, everything is there. So there is no question of impersonalism.